RELATO DE CASO: ESOFAGOGRAFIA COM MEGAESÔFAGO E PNEUMONIA POR ASPIRAÇÃO
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
O presente artigo descreve o diagnóstico de megaesôfago e pneumonia por broncoaspiração em um cão da raça Labrador Retriever. Foram realizados exames radiográficos simples e contrastados utilizando sulfato de bário para avaliar o esôfago e identificar possíveis complicações pulmonares. Os resultados radiográficos confirmaram a presença de dilatação esofágica e deslocamento ventral da traquéia, características comuns em pacientes com megaesôfago. Além disso, foi evidenciada a presença de pneumonia por broncoaspiração. O artigo ressalta a importância do diagnóstico precoce do megaesôfago, bem como o tratamento adequado das complicações pulmonares para melhorar a qualidade de vida do animal.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.032 | 0.085 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it