The diverse landscape of AB5-type toxins
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AB5-type toxins are a group of secreted protein toxins that are central virulence factors for bacterial pathogens such as Shigella dysenteriae, Vibrio cholerae, Bordetella pertussis, and certain lineages of pathogenic Escherichia coli and Salmonella enterica. AB5 toxins are composed of an active (A) subunit that manipulates host cell biology in complex with a pentameric binding/delivery (B) subunit that mediates the toxin's entry into host cells and its subsequent intracellular trafficking. Broadly speaking, all known AB5-type toxins adopt similar structural architectures and employ similar mechanisms of binding, entering and trafficking within host cells. Despite this, there is a remarkable amount of diversity amongst AB5-type toxins; this includes different toxin families with unrelated activities, as well as variation within families that can have profound functional consequences. In this review, we discuss the diversity that exists amongst characterized AB5-type toxins, with an emphasis on the genetic and functional variability within AB5 toxin families, how this may have evolved, and its impact on human disease.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".