Communs culturels et revitalisation territoriale : le cas du quartier Saint-Michel à Montréal
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article s’intéresse aux effets territoriaux du tournant participatif des politiques culturelles. Ce tournant se renforce à la faveur de l’évolution générale des modèles de gouvernance qui tentent d’inclure les aspirations de plus en plus affirmées des citoyens à prendre part aux différentes actions et décisions qui les concernent. Nous examinons le cas du quartier Saint-Michel à Montréal, quartier où se met en place une action collective communaliste qui se combine à une action entrepreneuriale liée à l’implantation du Cirque du Soleil dans le quartier. Le quartier est la scène d’un processus de revitalisation qui donne naissance à un commun culturel. Le cas de Saint-Michel permet de voir l’apport de l’approche culturelle communaliste à l’amélioration des milieux de vie des quartiers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".