MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4381950811 · doi:10.29303/ipr.v6i1.196

APPLICATION OF SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE ON DROUGHT CODE CLASSIFICATION IN NORTH SUMATRA INDONESIA

2022· article· en· W4381950811 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kartika Dewi Butar Butar, Poltak Sihombing, Tulus Tulus

Bibliographic record

VenueIndonesian Physical Review · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicData Mining and Machine Learning Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSupport vector machineCode (set theory)Computer scienceMeteorologyData miningGeographyClimatologyArtificial intelligenceGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study aims to classify the Drought Code in North Sumatra. Drought Code is part of Fire Danger Rating System (FDRS) developed in Canada. One of the sub-systems of FDRS is Fire Weather Index (FWI) that aims to evaluate fire hazards from current and past weather conditions. Drought Code is classified by using Support Vector Machine. Support Vector Machine is widely used in the data classification process. One of the advantages of Support Vector Machine methods is it has ability in classifying large amount of data and classifying more than two classes or multi-classes. Weather parameters used in this study are rainfall and temperature in North Sumatra. The data used are from 8 (eight) meteorological observation stations in North Sumatra from 2017 to 2021. Drought Code is carried out with several tests using several kernels contained in SVM.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIndonesian Physical ReviewSame topicData Mining and Machine Learning ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207