MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

GIGAPIXEL PHOTOGRAPHY FOR HIGH-ACCURACY FACADE DOCUMENTATION: MAPPING THE ORIGINAL LOCATION OF THE FORMA URBIS ROMAE

2023· article· en· W4381996843 on OpenAlexaff
Kristen Jones, George Bevan, Richard J. A. Talbert, Elizabeth Wolfram Thill, Daryn Lehoux

Bibliographic record

Venue˜The œinternational archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences/International archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
Topic3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersIndiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis
KeywordsFacadePhotogrammetryExcavationDigital surfacePhotographyArchaeologyObservatoryCourse (navigation)GeologyArtGeographyRemote sensingVisual artsEngineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract. The Forma Urbis Romae was a monumental marble map of ancient Rome from the Severan Dynasty. It was originally attached to the interior wall of the Temple of Peace, but through the course of the Middle Ages the marble panels of the map fell off or were deliberately removed. They have been found mainly in the vicinity of the Forum, but only about 10% of the original surface have been discovered. The wall on which the map was mounted is currently an exterior wall of the Church of SS. Cosma e Damiano, and the original holes from the iron nails used to attach the marble panels of the map are still visible on unrestored areas. In order to attempt a full reconstruction of the map from the fragments, detailed measurements of the positions of the mounting holes are required. Access to the wall itself is difficult because of its height, and surrounding construction and excavation. A method was needed to map the surface of the wall without the expense and complication of erecting scaffolding for direct hand-measurement. To this end, digital photogrammetry and gigapixel photography with a telephoto lens were combined to produce stereo-models from the street level 50 m away. From these stereo-models of merged panoramic images in excess of 200 megapixels and a Ground Sample Distance of 1 mm it was possible to use stereo-plotting to create a map of archaeologically relevant features that will serve as the foundation for determining the positions of the surviving marble pieces.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue˜The œinternational archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences/International archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences→Same topic3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage→French-language works237,207→