MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W43819989

Clinical Update : Breast cancer and distant metastatic disease

2000· article· en· W43819989 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
John Hoey

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Medical Association Journal · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBreast Cancer Treatment Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineBreast cancerChemotherapyStage (stratigraphy)Lymph nodeBone marrowCancerMetastatic breast cancerOncologyDiseaseInternal medicineRadiologySurgery
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Braun S, Pantel K, MUller P, Janni W, Hepp F, Kentenich CRM et al. Cytokeratin-positive cells in the bone marrow and survival of patients with stage I, II, or III breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2000;342(8):525-33. Background Many women with breast cancer that appears localized to the breast or to the breast and regional lymph nodes are believed to have undetectable distant metastases at the time of initial staging. Because of this, current recommendations are that systemic chemotherapy be given to all women with regional node involvement and to those with no node involvement but a primary lesion greater than 1 or 2 cm in diameter. However, the improvement in outcome with chemotherapy is slight. In women with a primary tumour of 1 cm or less, systemic therapy reduces the rate of distant metastases from 10% to 7%. Although this is a risk reduction of 40%, it means, in effect, that an average of only 3 women on average in every 100 actually benefit from the therapy.1 Thus, many women may needlessly undergo chemotherapy. However, if distant metastatic disease could be detected at the time of initial cancer diagnosis, the precision of prognistic stratification might be improved. A new technique to detect bone marrow micrometastatic lesions is now available. Question What proportion of women presenting with stage I, II or III breast cancer have distant metastatic disease? Design Bone marrow aspirates from the upper iliac crests were obtained from 743 consecutive patients admitted to a breast clinic in Germany; 552 had been newly diagnosed with stage I, II or III breast cancer and 191 patients with nonmalignant disease (mainly of the breast). The patients were followed for several years, thus providing some information on the test's usefulness in categorizing women into meaningful risk groups. Results Using an immunocytochemical technique to detect an antigen on cytokeratin peptides (a specific marker of epithelial cancer cells in bone marrow), 36% of the women with breast cancer tested positive, compared with only 1% of women without breast cancer. During a median follow-up period of 38 months, women with marrow-detectable cytokeratins were much more likely to die of cancer-related causes than women without the markers (relative risk 4.17; 95% confidence interval 2.51-6.94; p < 0.001). There were 301 women with no detectable lymph-node metastastes. Cytokeratin markers were found in the bone marrow of 23% of women with tumours smaller than 0.5 cm and 35% of those with tumours 0.5 to 1.0 cm. Of the 100 patients with node-negative tumours and evidence of micrometastases, 14 died of cancer-related causes over the follow-up period, compared with only 2 of the 201 women without micrometastases. Commentary This is a carefully conducted study of a large cohort of women. The testing for cytokeratins was done independently from the clinical staging. However, follow-up was relatively short, especially for a disease such as breast cancer. Clinical implications In a related editorial,1 Barbara Smith comments that it is now important to proceed with trials of therapy because the follow-up is relatively short for breast cancer. Nonetheless, the survival curves extending to 48 months show a continuous divergence of survival and disease-free survival between groups with and without micrometastases. Smith feels that it is premature to recommend cytokeratin tests to patients with disease limited to the breast who wish to avoid chemotherapy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.036

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0040.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Medical Association Journal→Same topicBreast Cancer Treatment Studies→French-language works237,207→