MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4382011186 · doi:10.1007/s00259-023-06315-z

Next-generation PET/CT imaging in meningioma—first clinical experiences using the novel SSTR-targeting peptide [18F]SiTATE

2023· article· en· W4382011186 on OpenAlexaff
Marcus Unterrainer, Sophie Carina Kunte, Lena M. Unterrainer, Adrien Holzgreve, Astrid Delker, Simon Lindner, Leonie Beyer, Matthias Brendel, Wolfgang G. Kunz, Michael Winkelmann, Clemens C. Cyran, Jens Ricke, Klaus Jurkschat, Carmen Wängler, Björn Wängler, Ralf Schirrmacher, Claus Belka, Maximilian Niyazi, Joerg‐Christian Tonn, Peter Bartenstein, Nathalie L. Albert

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMeningioma and schwannoma management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftSociety of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
KeywordsMeningiomaMedicineNuclear medicineRadiologyPET-CTPositron emission tomography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Somatostatin-receptor (SSTR)-targeted PET/CT provides important clinical information in addition to standard imaging in meningioma patients. [ 18 F]SiTATE is a novel, 18 F-labeled SSTR-targeting peptide with superior imaging properties according to preliminary data. We provide the first [ 18 F]SiTATE PET/CT data of a large cohort of meningioma patients. Methods Patients with known or suspected meningioma undergoing [ 18 F]SiTATE PET/CT were included. Uptake intensity (SUV) of meningiomas, non-meningioma lesions, and healthy organs were assessed using a 50% isocontour volume of interest (VOI) or a spherical VOI, respectively. Also, trans-osseous extension on PET/CT was assessed. Results A total of 107 patients with 117 [ 18 F]SiTATE PET/CT scans were included. Overall, 231 meningioma lesions and 61 non-meningioma lesions (e.g., post-therapeutic changes) were analyzed. Physiological uptake was lowest in healthy brain tissue, followed by bone marrow, parotid, and pituitary (SUV mean 0.06 ± 0.04 vs. 1.4 ± 0.9 vs. 1.6 ± 1.0 vs. 9.8 ± 4.6; p < 0.001). Meningiomas showed significantly higher uptake than non-meningioma lesions (SUV max 11.6 ± 10.6 vs. 4.0 ± 3.3, p < 0.001). Meningiomas showed significantly higher uptake than non-meningioma lesions (SUVmax 11.6±10.6 vs. 4.0±3.3, p<0.001). 93/231 (40.3%) meningiomas showed partial trans-osseous extension and 34/231 (14.7%) predominant intra-osseous extension. 59/231 (25.6%) meningioma lesions found on PET/CT had not been reported on previous standard imaging. Conclusion This is the first PET/CT study using an 18 F-labeled SSTR-ligand in meningioma patients: [ 18 F]SiTATE provides extraordinary contrast in meningioma compared to healthy tissue and non-meningioma lesions, which leads to a high detection rate of so far unknown meningioma sites and osseous involvement. Having in mind the advantageous logistic features of 18 F-labeled compared to 68 Ga-labeled compounds (e.g., longer half-life and large-badge production), [ 18 F]SiTATE has the potential to foster a widespread use of SSTR-targeted imaging in neuro-oncology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.602
Threshold uncertainty score0.568

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.095
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations29
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular ImagingSame topicMeningioma and schwannoma managementFrench-language works237,207