Impact of Firm Power on Debt Structure, Bank Loan Financing and Corporate Performance in China
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper examines the incidence of firm value chain power on its exterior financing liabilities, bank loan financing and firm performance. Taking data from the China Stock Market and Accounting Research (CSMAR), this study has gathered cross-sectional data of 13,653 firms from 2006 to 2016. The results indicate that industries with higher power in the value chain carry a lower volume of financing liabilities. The results also show that companies with greater firm power use lower financing liabilities and aim to utilize non-cost commercial credit for financing. The study also reveals that creditors from the banks sector give more hand to large firms, and the role of firm power has merely been accepted by banks in big-scale and constant companies. Additionally, firm power has no considerable impact on the maturity of bank loans. After last, this study moreover unveils the economic outcomes of the effect of firm value chain power across the differences in firm financial performance. Low-scale, great-growth firms with bigger firm power get best financial performance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it