MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4382020847 · doi:10.1007/978-1-4842-9470-3_16

Multistate Check Boxes

2023· book-chapter· en· W4382020847 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueApress eBooks · 2023
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMathematics, Computing, and Information Processing
Canadian institutionsDelta-Q Technologies (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBlankSymbol (formal)Field (mathematics)ArithmeticSpace (punctuation)Computer scienceOrder (exchange)MathematicsEngineeringProgramming languagePure mathematicsOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Chapter Goal: When space is limited in a document, it is often helpful to be able to combine multiple states into one field. For example, suppose that you have a form and in it you would like to be able to change the setting from blank to a check symbol (representing yes) or to an X or cross symbol (representing no or wrong). Or maybe you have multiple symbols that represent distinct levels. As the user who fills out the form advances in skill, they require a frequent update to their status in a specific order. In this chapter, you’ll see how to create a type of multistate check box using a button field.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.508
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it