MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4382020847 · doi:10.1007/978-1-4842-9470-3_16

Multistate Check Boxes

2023· book-chapter· en· W4382020847 on OpenAlexaff
Jennifer Harder

Bibliographic record

VenueApress eBooks · 2023
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMathematics, Computing, and Information Processing
Canadian institutionsDelta-Q Technologies (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBlankSymbol (formal)Field (mathematics)ArithmeticSpace (punctuation)Computer scienceOrder (exchange)MathematicsEngineeringProgramming languagePure mathematicsOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Chapter Goal: When space is limited in a document, it is often helpful to be able to combine multiple states into one field. For example, suppose that you have a form and in it you would like to be able to change the setting from blank to a check symbol (representing yes) or to an X or cross symbol (representing no or wrong). Or maybe you have multiple symbols that represent distinct levels. As the user who fills out the form advances in skill, they require a frequent update to their status in a specific order. In this chapter, you’ll see how to create a type of multistate check box using a button field.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.442
Threshold uncertainty score0.796

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.006
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.4420.199

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApress eBooksSame topicMathematics, Computing, and Information ProcessingFrench-language works237,207