MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4382047506 · doi:10.1139/cjpp-2022-0524

Sex hormone dose escalation for treating abnormal sleep in ovariectomized rats: in vitro GABA synthesis in sleep-related brain areas

2023· article· en· W4382047506 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Nayely Carrasco-Nuñes, Marta Romano, Marisa Cabeza

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMenopause: Health Impacts and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOvariectomized ratInternal medicineEndocrinologyHormoneGlutamate receptorMedicineGlutamate decarboxylaseMelatoninChemistryReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

No data in the literature have evaluated sex hormone dose escalation for treating abnormal sleep of ovariectomized rats—nor studies on the role of sex hormones in GABA synthesis of rats' sleep-related areas. The main aim of this study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of estradiol (ET), progesterone (PT), and the mixture of both (EPT) to restore normal sleep in a model of menopause in rats. The second purpose was to describe the in vitro activity of glutamate decarboxylase (GAD) in sleep-related brain areas in the presence or absence of sex hormones. A weekly dose-escalation design of ET, PT, or EPT was implemented in ovariectomized rats (six per group). Dose escalation continued until the dose at which 100% of the rats exhibited a state of “complete somnolence.” Doses that were not toxic or did not show side effects were considered. For in vitro experiments, sleep-related brain areas were separated and incubated with radiolabeled glutamate. Estradiol (17β-E2), progesterone (P), and pyridoxal phosphate (PLP) were added to this assay, and GAD activity was determined. Under the same conditions, a second test was carried out, but the P antagonist RU486 was added to assess the role of P in GAD activity. Ovariectomy increased periodic awakenings compared to those determined for the SHAM group. The EPT for ovariectomized rats was very effective by the fifth week in decreasing arousal and achieving a similar sleep behavior to the SHAM-control group. Rats tolerated the ET, PT, and EPT well to the maximum planned dose (0.66 mg/kg and 4.4 mg/kg, respectively). No lethal events occurred; the MTD was reached. The in vitro studies indicated that the presence of 17β-E2 plus P in the assay triggered the activity of isotype 65 GAD in all the studied brain areas. RU486 in the incubation medium blocked such activity; however, the action of isotype 67 GAD was not blocked by RU486. A dose-escalation model was determined; the MTD coincided with the maximum dose of ET and PT used. However, the EPT combination restored normal sleep in the menopause model compared to the SHAMs without toxic effects. The in vitro model demonstrated that 17β-E2 plus P presence in the assay increased the activity of GAD65 in the studied brain tissues.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology→Same topicMenopause: Health Impacts and Treatments→French-language works237,207→