MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4382050905 · doi:10.1175/aies-22masthead

Masthead

2023· paratext· en· W4382050905 on OpenAlexaff
Amy McGovern, John T. Allen, William W. Campbell, S. Scott Collis, John David, Michael Scheuerer, Haruko Murakami, Alexandra Anderson-Frey, Elizabeth A. Barnes, Randy J. Chase, Julie L. Demuth, Gregory Dusek, Tim Gallaudet, Alex Haberlie, Aaron Hill, Susan Jasko, Sarah King, Ryan Lagerquist, Sebastian Lerch, Eric D. Loken, María J. Molina, Chuyen Nguyen, Benjamin Richards, Jebb Q. Stewart, André van der Westhuysen, D Campbell, Kirien Whan, Michaël Zamo, Andrea Herbst, Cristina Mcgovern, Tiffany Barletta, Hayley Bischoff, Felicia Charney, Erin Gulotta, Christine Gumbel

Bibliographic record

VenueArtificial Intelligence for the Earth Systems · 2023
Typeparatext
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMeteorological Phenomena and Simulations
Canadian institutionsImpact
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

SYSTEMS publishes research on the development and application of methods in Artificial Intelligence (AI), Machine Learning (ML), data science, and statistics that is relevant to meteorology, atmospheric science, hydrology, climate science, and ocean sciences. Topics include development of AI/ML, statistical, and hybrid methods and their application; development and application of methods to further the physical understanding of earth system processes from AI/ML models such as explainable and physics-based AI; the use of AI/ML to emulate components of numerical weather and climate models; incorporation of AI/ML into observation and remote sensing platforms; the use of AI/ML for data assimilation and uncertainty quantification; and societal applications of AI/ML for AIES disciplines, including ethical and responsible use of AI/ML and educational research on AI/ML.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.098
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0100.006
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.9020.836

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.148
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.163 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArtificial Intelligence for the Earth SystemsSame topicMeteorological Phenomena and SimulationsFrench-language works237,207