MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4382051701 · doi:10.1353/boc.0.a901331

Arms and Letters: Military Life Writing in Early Modern Spain by Faith S. Harden.

2023· article· en· W4382051701 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Luis F. Avilés

Bibliographic record

VenueBulletin of the Comediantes · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLatin American history and culture
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHonorFaithSpectacleDignityNarrativePleasureAestheticsSociologyTheologyArtPsychologyLiteraturePhilosophyLawPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

B U L L E T I N O F T H E C O M E D I A N T E S 2 0 2 2 – 2 3 | v ol / 7 4 N º 1 + 2 p r e p u b l i c at i o n ( p r o j e c t m u s e ) 1 r e v i e w s Faith S. Harden. Arms and Letters: Military Life Writing in Early Modern Spain. U of Toronto P, 2020. 188 pp. Luis F. Avilés University of California, Irvine This book analyzes a select number of autobiographies written by soldiers in early modern Spain, with a special emphasis on the literary and social forces that contributed to their authorial self-fashioning. The constitution of a first-person narrative voice depended upon several factors. Faith Harden’s approach focuses on the central role played by honor in the writing of a soldier’s experiences, at times imposing limits while at others promoting creativity and nuance. This allowed soldiers of lower social rank to infuse dignity in their writings even when their deeds were questionable. Honor was highly important for soldiers whose purpose was to receive a reward, enhance their stature, or simply produce a spectacle of their own self. Harden proposes that the fashioning of a self depended on a creative understanding of honor as a public extension of the author’s lived experiences in a complex economy of benefits, recognition, rewards, pleasure, social mobility, and the dangers of public self-exposure. Another factor crucial for fashioning an authorial voice was the diversity of genres available. Harden convincingly traces genres such as chivalric romances, lives of martyrs, military treatises, legal testimonies, and the picaresque novel, among others. She documents very well the variety of ways in which these genres were incorporated into soldiers’ autobiographies. Harden makes a strong argument for the importance of taking into account all the forces (literary, material, social, and sexual) that intervene in the creation of the written self. Chapter 1 is devoted to Diego García de Paredes’s (1468–1533) Breve Suma, giving an account of how he was able to appropriate and transform the negative perspective of the mercenary soldier into a record of experiences that are worthy of emulation. Harden focuses on the way García de Paredes emphasizes his strong sense of personal honor and camaraderie towards other soldiers, effectively counteracting the negative perception of mercenary soldiers by prospective readers. For this soldier-autobiographer, individuality and loyalty to himself and his fellow comrades was more important than obeying superiors. Harden identifies a shifting articulation of exemplarity as well, arguing that García de Paredes proposes himself as a heroic model for other soldiers. Exemplarity also stems from the chivalric code and how B U L L E T I N O F T H E C O M E D I A N T E S 2 0 2 2 – 2 3 | v ol / 7 4 N º 1 + 2 p r e p u b l i c at i o n ( p r o j e c t m u s e ) 2 it was appropriated by soldiers like Paredes, who were from lower social strata. Harden provides a lucid account of the idiosyncratic way in which the author makes use of the chivalric code, as for example, when he is implicated in various acts of intense violence, or when he demonstrates his lack of refinement towards women. In chapter 2 Harden focuses on what she describes as the “petitionary mode of life writing” (21) in the works of Diego Suárez Corvín (1552–1623) and Domingo de Toral y Valdés (1598–1635). The petitionary mode is characterized by a relationship of inequality between the writer and the intended receiver of the text. Thus, writing is meant to be a service that provides some worthwhile knowledge obtained though experience and study. For example, Harden argues that Suárez Corvín displays his own intellectual capacity, promotes truthfulness and credibility above fiction, and demonstrates moderation and sexual self-control, distancing himself from the traditional image of the unruly soldier. Exiled to what...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.144
Threshold uncertainty score0.595

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.178
Teacher spread0.167 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBulletin of the ComediantesSame topicLatin American history and cultureFrench-language works237,207