MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4382054171 · doi:10.1109/cmvit57620.2023.00009

Basic Research on Machine Vision Underpinned by Image Frame Algebra (VFA) and Visual Semantic Algebra (VSA)

2023· article· en· W4382054171 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCognitive Computing and Networks
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceFrame (networking)Feature (linguistics)Algebra over a fieldMathematicsPure mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Computer vison [1], [2], [3], [4], [5] studies properties of machine vision, its semantic understanding, and general manipulations by Intelligent Mathematics (IM) [6], [7], [8], [9], [10] [11], [12], [13], [14], [15] [16], [17]. Computer vison has been studies from various aspects such as algorithmic methods, analysis methods, pattern recognitions, and neural-network-regression (AI) technologies [2], [3]. However, there is a lack of fundamental theories for enabling autonomous image recognition and processing by machines. Basic research on contemporary IM has revealed that formal manipulations of visual objects by intelligent machines may be rigorously implemented by Image Frame Algebra (IFA) [8], [18] in the front-end and Visual Semantic Algebra (VSA) [19] in the backend. IFA formally manipulates visual images as general 2D matrixes by a set of algebraic operators such as modeling, analyses, syntheses, feature elicitation, and pattern recognition [4], [5], [18]. Then, its counterpart, VSA, transforms the geographic relations of visual objects to their semantic interpretations by algebraic analyses and compositions. The coherent theory of IFA and VSA provides a formal methodology for machine-enabled image processing and comprehension. This keynote presents a theoretical framework of machine vision underpinned by IFA and VSA for the structural denotations of visual objects and functional manipulations of visual mechanisms [3], [8], [9]. It demonstrates how the persistent challenges to machine vision may be rigorously and efficiently solved by the IFA/VSA methodology. Case studies on applying IFA/VSA for rigorous visual pattern detection, recognition, analysis, and composition in real world will be demonstrated [5], [18], [20]. As two coherent paradigms of IM, among others [21], [22], [23], [24], [25] [26], [27], [28], [29], [30], IFA and VSA have been applied not only in robot visual and spatial reasoning, but also in computational intelligence and AI for rigorously representing and manipulating of visual objects and patterns by machine recognition and cognition [31], [32], [33], [34], [35] [36], [37], [38], [39], [40], [41], [42], [43], [44], [45] [46], [47], [48], [49], [50], [51], [52], [53], [54], [55], [56], [57], [58], [59], [60], [61], [62], [63], [64], [65] [66], [67], [68], [69], [70], [71], [72], [73], [74], [75] [76].

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.966
Threshold uncertainty score0.965

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.364
Teacher spread0.327 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCognitive Computing and NetworksFrench-language works237,207