MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4382055173 · doi:10.1021/cen-10120-buscon7

Chemical companies warn about quarter

2023· article· en· W4382055173 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Alex Tullo

Bibliographic record

VenueC&EN Global Enterprise · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicGlobal Energy and Sustainability Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)EarningsChinaGermanChemical industryCommerceBusinessEconomicsFinanceEngineeringPolitical scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A few large chemical companies are coming out with early warnings that the second quarter will be disappointing. The German firm Lanxess says profits for the quarter—and possibly for the rest of the year—will fall below market expectations. It says that it is not yet seeing a recovery in demand in China and other big markets and that it is still being negatively affected by high energy prices in Germany. Like Lanxess, carbon materials specialist Cabot has yet to see an uptick in business in China and warns that earnings could disappoint. Olin expects earnings to be lower than its previous forecast because of longer-than-anticipated repairs at a vinyl chloride plant, as well as deteriorating market conditions. The chlorine chemical maker is also trimming operations; it is ceasing production in Gumi, South Korea, and reducing epoxy capacity in Freeport, Texas.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.556
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueC&EN Global EnterpriseSame topicGlobal Energy and Sustainability ResearchFrench-language works237,207