Estimation of Mediation Effect on Zero-Inflated Microbiome Mediators
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The mediation analysis methodology of the cause-and-effect relationship through mediators has been increasingly popular over the past decades. The human microbiome can contribute to the pathogenesis of many complex diseases by mediating disease-leading causal pathways. However, standard mediation analysis is not adequate for microbiome data due to the excessive number of zero values and the over-dispersion in the sequencing reads, which arise for both biological and sampling reasons. To address these unique challenges brought by the zero-inflated mediator, we developed a novel mediation analysis algorithm under the potential-outcome framework to fill this gap. The proposed semiparametric model estimates the mediation effect of the microbiome by decomposing indirect effects into two components according to the zero-inflated distributions. The bootstrap algorithm is utilized to calculate the empirical confidence intervals of the causal effects. We conducted extensive simulation studies to investigate the performance of the proposed weighting-based approach and some model-based alternatives, and our proposed model showed robust performance. The proposed algorithm was implemented in a real human microbiome study of identifying whether some taxa mediate the relationship between LACTIN-V treatment and immune response.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".