MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4382131062 · doi:10.26034/fr.zfrk.2016.019

Quelle place accorder aux thèmes sensibles dans l’enseignement d’Éthique et culture religieuse au Québec ?

2016· article· de· W4382131062 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZeitschrift für Religionskunde · 2016
Typearticle
Languagede
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicReligious Education and Schools
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dieser Artikel fokussiert auf den Unterricht heikler Themen, die mit Religion im québec’schen Lehrplan des Faches „Ethik und religiöse Kultur“ (éthique et culture religieuse, ECR) verbunden sind. Es wird analysiert, wie die dazugehörigen Lehrmittel und Schulhefte, die zu diesem Curriculum gehören, die heiklen Themen behandeln. Auch wenn der Lehrplan an wenigen Stellen die Problematik dieser Themen anerkennt, haben die Lehrpersonen die Tendenz, diese nicht zu thematisieren, da sie einen möglichen Aufruhr vermeiden wollen, welcher Diskussionen in der Klasse verursachen könnte. In welchem Ausmass können die Lehrmittel die Lehrpersonen in ihrer Unterrichtsvorbereitung dahingehend unterstützen?

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.696
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.309 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZeitschrift für ReligionskundeSame topicReligious Education and SchoolsFrench-language works237,207