Clonostachys rosea ‘omics profiling: identification of putative metabolite-gene associations mediating its in vitro antagonism against Fusarium graminearum
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Clonostachys rosea is an established biocontrol agent. Selected strains have either mycoparasitic activity against known pathogens (e.g. Fusarium species) and/or plant growth promoting activity on various crops. Here we report outcomes from a comparative 'omics analysis leveraging a temporal variation in the in vitro antagonistic activities of C. rosea strains ACM941 and 88-710, toward understanding the molecular mechanisms underpinning mycoparasitism. RESULTS: Transcriptomic data highlighted specialized metabolism and membrane transport related genes as being significantly upregulated in ACM941 compared to 88-710 at a time point when the ACM941 strain had higher in vitro antagonistic activity than 88-710. In addition, high molecular weight specialized metabolites were differentially secreted by ACM941, with accumulation patterns of some metabolites matching the growth inhibition differences displayed by the exometabolites of the two strains. In an attempt to identify statistically relevant relationships between upregulated genes and differentially secreted metabolites, transcript and metabolomic abundance data were associated using IntLIM (Integration through Linear Modeling). Of several testable candidate associations, a putative C. rosea epidithiodiketopiperazine (ETP) gene cluster was identified as a prime candidate based on both co-regulation analysis and transcriptomic-metabolomic data association. CONCLUSIONS: Although remaining to be validated functionally, these results suggest that a data integration approach may be useful for identification of potential biomarkers underlying functional divergence in C. rosea strains.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".