MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4382138800 · doi:10.1073/pnas.2218976120

An integrated RF energy–harvesting system with broad input voltage range and high power conversion efficiency

2023· article· en· W4382138800 on OpenAlexafffund
Shuren Wang, Xiaoxue Jiang, Heng Pan, Xuanjie Ye, Jie Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnergy Harvesting in Wireless Networks
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersAlberta InnovatesChina Scholarship CouncilNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMitacsGovernment of Canada
KeywordsEnergy harvestingElectrical engineeringPower (physics)VoltageRange (aeronautics)Energy conversion efficiencyEnergy transformationMaterials scienceEngineeringPhysicsAerospace engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

By 2050, countries around the world are expected to be gradually phasing out fossil fuels and implementing greener energy technologies. In this work, we present a system employing Energy harvesting, a self-powered technology that can recycle energy from the surrounding environment. A high-efficiency radio frequency (RF) energy-harvesting chip was designed and fabricated. With an off-chip antenna and rectifier, the system scavenges ambient RF energy and converts it into usable energy, which is then stored in energy storage elements (such as a supercapacitor or a rechargeable battery). The system can further be implemented as an energy source for charging smart devices. The system-on-chip design consists of a cold start block, a boost converter with maximum power point tracking functionalities, and a charging block. The chip was fabricated using AMS 350 nm technology. Although the system was optimized for harvesting RF energy, it can be easily adapted to harvest other energy sources (i.e., mechanical and thermal energy sources). Using an optimized cold start architecture, the circuit has a cold start voltage of 380 mV. With an improved control strategy of power conversion, the system is capable of continuously charging up to 4.5 V with a broad input voltage range of 100 mV to 10 V and has a peak charging efficiency of 82%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the National Academy of SciencesSame topicEnergy Harvesting in Wireless NetworksFrench-language works237,207