MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4382139299 · doi:10.1080/00219592.2023.2222757

A Numerical Study for the Growth of InGaSb Crystals with a Flatter Interface by Vertical Gradient Freezing under Normal Gravity and Utilizing Bayesian Optimization

2023· article· en· W4382139299 on OpenAlexaff
Rachid Ghritli, Yasunori Okano, Yuko Inatomi, S. Dost

Bibliographic record

VenueJOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING OF JAPAN · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicSolidification and crystal growth phenomena
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
FundersKyushu University
KeywordsConvectionMechanicsNatural convectionMaterials scienceTemperature gradientCrystal growthZero gravityComputer simulationChemistryThermodynamicsPhysicsMeteorology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Growth of InGaSb crystals with a flatter growth interface by Vertical Gradient Freezing (VFG) under normal gravity was numerically investigated. The growth of high-quality crystals is difficult due to the adverse effect of natural convection under the effect of Earth’s gravity. The natural convection developing in the melt leads to an undesirable non-flat growth interface and thus affects the quality of grown crystals. In order to obtain a flatter growth interface and better compositional uniformity in the melt, the applications of crucible rotation and external magnetic field are considered. We carried out a numerical study to optimize growth parameters for these purposes. We also considered the utilization of Bayesian optimization to have a fast search for most favorable control parameters. Such an optimization has led to a significant reduction in the growth interface deflection and a flatter growth interface was maintained during the entire growth process. Strength of natural convection in the melt was minimized and melt solute uniformity was improved. The growth rate was also increased without compromising crystal quality. Simulation results showed that the use of a numerical simulation together with Bayesian optimization is an effective way to provide a better control for the growth parameters involved.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.185
Threshold uncertainty score0.302

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING OF JAPANSame topicSolidification and crystal growth phenomenaFrench-language works237,207