Трактовка богоданной власти в России периода становления и утверждения абсолютизма
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The paper deals with the power system established in Russia in the late half of the 17th – first quarter of the 18th century as interpreted by its contemporaries. The Russian monarchy was seen then as God-given, hereditary and autocratic. The thinkers of that time weren’t beyond assuming that the power was granted by God to a monarch through an intermediary who could be a single person or a communion of people, but still believed that the will of God was behind the people’s actions at all times. A monarch answered to God for his/her actions, but was considered above human judgement. Acting against him/her was, therefore, in effect, denying the divine origin of the monarch’s power and viewing the Tsar as Antichrist. Tsars were often seen as stewards of God, but any attempts on their part to emulate God were frowned upon. The purpose of the Tsars’ power was, in the general opinion, to benefit the people.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.030 | 0.072 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".