MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4382195660 · doi:10.1021/acsomega.3c02786

Non-targeted Screening of Natural Products from 288 Fungal Endophytes from Canadian Fruit Crops

2023· article· en· W4382195660 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Natasha DesRochers, Justin B. Renaud, Joey B. Tanney, Ashraf Ibrahim, Ken K.‐C. Yeung, Mark W. Sumarah

Bibliographic record

VenueACS Omega · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMicrobial Natural Products and Biosynthesis
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityNatural Resources CanadaCanadian Forest ServiceAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaWestern University
FundersAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaWestern University
KeywordsBiologyPesticideBioassayPlant use of endophytic fungi in defenseBiotechnologyFungal DiversityBotanyAgronomyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Many diverse species of fungi naturally occur as endophytes in plants. The majority of these fungi produce secondary metabolites of diverse structures and biological activities. Culture extracts from 288 fungi isolated from surface-sterilized blueberries, cranberries, raspberries, and grapes were analyzed by LC-HRMS/MS. Global Natural Products Social (GNPS) Molecular Networking modeling was used to investigate the secondary metabolites in the extracts. This technique increased the speed and simplicity of dereplicating the extracts, targeting new compounds that are structurally related. In total, 60 known compounds were dereplicated from this collection and seven new compounds were identified. These previously unknown compounds are targets for purification, characterization, and bioactivity testing in future studies. The fungal endophytes characterized in this study are potential candidates for providing bio-protection to the host plant with a reduced reliance on chemical pesticides.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.250
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2023
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACS OmegaSame topicMicrobial Natural Products and BiosynthesisFrench-language works237,207