MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4382199147 · doi:10.18280/ts.400302

Real-Time Driver Drowsiness Detection and Classification on Embedded Systems Using Machine Learning Algorithms

2023· article· en· W4382199147 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Muhammet Emin Şahin

Bibliographic record

VenueTraitement du signal · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicSleep and Work-Related Fatigue
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceAlgorithmMachine learningPattern recognition (psychology)Speech recognitionReal-time computing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Traffic accidents caused by driver drowsiness are a significant concern.An automatic, contactless device capable of early detection and identification of a driver's drowsy state could greatly enhance their safety.This study presents a real-time driver drowsiness detection and classification system implemented on Jetson Nano and Jetson TX2 embedded systems using machine learning algorithms, including Logistic Regression, Naive Bayes, K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Decision Tree, Random Forest, and Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP).Feature extraction is performed on images obtained from video segments within the dataset, followed by a normalization process.The normalized features are classified using machine learning algorithms, and the results are reported.A 10-fold cross-validation model is employed during the experiment, and the grid search hyperparameter optimization (GSHPO) method is used to fine-tune the classifier algorithms' parameters for the proposed system.The MLP classifier outperformed the other classifiers, achieving an accuracy, F1score, and AUC (the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC)) of 0.91, 0.91, and 0.90, respectively.The developed system is implemented on Jetson Nano and Jetson TX2 embedded systems, and the frames per second (FPS) results are provided for comparison.The high accuracy of this hardware-based system in detecting drowsy driving, along with its portability for in-vehicle use, is a critical aspect of this work.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.916
Threshold uncertainty score0.736

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTraitement du signalSame topicSleep and Work-Related FatigueFrench-language works237,207