MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4382201542 · doi:10.3756/artsci.22.3_1

A Study on Component Reassembly Assist Method Using Simple Marker by Recording and Replaying Disassembly Order

2023· article· en· W4382201542 on OpenAlexaff
Ryuuta Tanaka, Mengbo You, Kouichi Konno, Takamitsu Tanaka

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of the Society for Art and Science · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage Processing and 3D Reconstruction
Canadian institutionsAlpha Technologies (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

部品のメンテナンスや調査のために,すでに組み立てられている立体物を分解した後に再組立することがある.一般に,すでに組み立てられているものを再組立するときには,製品に付属している組立図を用いるが,組立図は二次元的な情報表現であるため,部品の細かい特徴を描写できず,表示手法に限界がある.また,組立図を紛失している場合や元々存在しない場合,組立手順を再現することが困難になる.そこで,本論文では,分解順序の記録と再生により部品の再組立を支援する手法を提案する.本手法は,ひとつの部品を分解するごとに,分解手順を記録し,再組立を行うときに適切な順序で再生することによって組立手順を再現し,ユーザに提示する手法である.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of the Society for Art and ScienceSame topicImage Processing and 3D ReconstructionFrench-language works237,207