MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4382203686 · doi:10.18280/ijsdp.180617

Integrated Model of Brand Trust for Green Marketing

2023· article· en· W4382203686 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Fauziyah Nur Jamal, Norfaridatul Akmaliah Othman, Dyah Fitriani, Wafrotur Rohmah, Raden Achmad Chairdino Leuveano, Afiqoh Akmalia Fahmi

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDigital Marketing and Social Media
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversitas Ahmad DahlanUniversiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka
KeywordsBusinessGreen marketingMarketingAdvertising

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Green marketing has become a trendy topic, particularly in the industrial property sector, where it is urgently needed in Indonesia.Brand trust is crucial for winning customers, and an integrated marketing strategy is necessary to build it.This study aims to develop a brand trust model integrated with green marketing.The researchers built a Brand Trust Integrated Model, which includes five conceptual models with key variables (information credibility, customer engagement, communication tools, green purchase intentions, and eco-labeling).The model was tested using 400 questionnaires, and SEM-Amos was used for the analysis.The results show that the green marketing conceptual model on brand trust is successful in Indonesia's Industrial Property context, combining the five proposed conceptual models and yielding significant results (customer engagement and green purchase intention).These findings provide a basis for increasing brand trust in the future, promoting the comfort of the Indonesian Industrial Property environment, and informing customers about the benefits of green property, thereby increasing scientific knowledge.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Sustainable Development and PlanningSame topicDigital Marketing and Social MediaFrench-language works237,207