A Sustainable Socio-Economic System Model Leveraging AGILE Management Technologies for Fostering Innovations
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The primary objective of this study is to explore the potential of AGILE management technologies in facilitating innovation within the framework of a sustainable socio-economic system.Investigating the sustainable development of the socio-economic system, the research focuses on devising a model that incorporates AGILE management technologies to foster innovation in accordance with the principles of sustainable development.Utilizing state-ofthe-art decomposition modeling methods, the research methodology encompasses the development of a goal tree, a context diagram, and a fundamental decomposition.The novelty of this study lies in the introduction of an innovative methodological approach that integrates AGILE management technologies with the sustainable development of the socio-economic system.A limitation of this study is the exclusive focus on AGILE management technologies within the context of socio-economic system sustainability.Future research endeavors should explore the potential of personnel management in promoting innovation within the sustainable development framework.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it