MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4382240616 · doi:10.14293/icmb230049

Housing-related determinants of lung health in Nunavik, Canada

2023· article· en· W4382240616 on OpenAlexaffabout
Yasemin D. Aktaş, Caroline Duchaine, Spyros Efthymiopoulos, Patrick Miron, Boualem Ouazia, Marc Veillette, Larry Watt, Wenping Yang, Faiz Ahmad Khan

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHealth disparities and outcomes
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health CentreMakivik CorporationNational Research Council CanadaUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArcticEnvironmental healthThe arcticClimate changeGeographyPolitical scienceEnvironmental protectionEnvironmental planningEconomic growthMedicineEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The impact of climate change on lung health has been long established. The Inuit Nunangat region of Nunavik in Quebec, Canada has long started to face the consequences of climate change. In conjunction with the region’s existing vulnerabilities rooted in social determinants of health and historic injustices, this leads to poor lung health across Nunavik as evidenced by much higher lung disease rates than the Canadian average. This paper aims to describe the aims, objectives and methodology of a new project that has recently been launched to address these issues with specific emphasis on mould detection as well as indoor and building fabric survey: “Resilient Responses to Protect Lung Health in Nunavik” (Anirniq, 2022-2025) funded as part of the Canada-Inuit Nunangat-United Kingdom (CINUK) Arctic Research Programme.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.044
Threshold uncertainty score0.323

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0060.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.000
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.364
Teacher spread0.336 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHealth disparities and outcomes→French-language works237,207→