MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4382294046 · doi:10.3389/frwa.2023.1148379

Micro-flow imaging for in-situ and real-time enumeration and identification of microplastics in water

2023· article· en· W4382294046 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Water · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMicroplastics and Plastic Pollution
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersEnvironment and Climate Change Canada
KeywordsMicroplasticsParticle (ecology)Computer scienceIdentification (biology)Process engineeringConsistency (knowledge bases)Biological systemNanotechnologyEnumerationEnvironmental scienceSample (material)Particle sizeMaterials scienceArtificial intelligenceChemistryMathematicsChromatographyEngineeringGeologyChemical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Microplastics (MPs) are emerging contaminants that have recently gained global attention. Current identification and quantification methods are known to be time-consuming, labor-intensive, and lack consensus on protocol standardization. This study explored the potential of micro-flow imaging (MFI) technology for rapid and in-situ identification and enumeration of MPs in water using two (2) MFI-based particle counters. Advantages, limitations, and recommendations for using MFI for MPs analysis were discussed. MPs with diverse physical (i.e., microbeads, fragments, fibers, and films) and surface (i.e., reflectivity, microporosity, color) characteristics were analyzed to understand the detection capabilities and limitations of MFI technology. Results demonstrated that MFI effectively automates most manually obtained particle features, such as size, color, object intensity and shape descriptors. It imparts consistency and reduces the subjective nature of results, thus enabling reliable comparison of the generated data. The particles can be further categorized based on their circularity and aspect ratio providing further insight into the shape and potential erosion of MPs in the environment. Transparent particles, often missed with other techniques such as microscopy, were detected by the MFI technology. The ability to assign particle IDs to MPs was an important advantage of the MFI technology that enabled the further investigation of selected MPs of interest. The limitations of the MFI technology were apparent in samples with high particle concentrations, with reflective MPs, and in the presence of bubbles. The color of the background against which the image was captured also influenced the detection accuracy. Procedural modifications during sample analysis and improvements in image analysis can assist in overcoming these challenges. MFI requires minimal sample preparation and gives real-time imaging data, making it a prime candidate for field monitoring in surface water systems in addition to laboratory analysis. With the potential application of machine learning and similar developments in the future, MFI-based particle counters are well-positioned to meet an important need in in-flow and real-time identification and enumeration of MPs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.233
Threshold uncertainty score0.256

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.189
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it