MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4382314802 · doi:10.3389/ffgc.2023.1082233

Leaf litter decomposition rates: influence of successional age, topography and microenvironment on six dominant tree species in a tropical dry forest

2023· article· en· W4382314802 on OpenAlexaff
Hernán Morffi-Mestre, Gregorio Ángeles–Pérez, Jennifer S. Powers, José Luís Andrade, Richard Evan Feldman, Filogonio May‐Pat, Francisco Chi-May, Juan Manuel Dupuy

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Forests and Global Change · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicForest ecology and management
Canadian institutionsMinistry of Natural Resources and Forestry
FundersU.S. Forest ServiceConsejo Nacional de Ciencia y TecnologíaComisión Nacional ForestalUnited States Agency for International Development
KeywordsLitterPlant litterBasal areaNutrientSoil fertilityBiomass (ecology)AgronomyVegetation (pathology)Chemical process of decompositionPioneer speciesEcosystemBiologyEcological successionEcologyEnvironmental scienceBotanyDecompositionSoil water

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Litter decomposition is a central process in forest ecosystems because of its role in carbon and nutrient cycling and maintaining soil fertility. Decomposition is affected by plant traits, soil and microenvironmental conditions, topography, and vegetation structure, which varies with successional age. However, it is unclear how all these factors affect leaf decomposition of dominant tree species in tropical dry forests (TDFs). The objective of this study was to compare the decomposition rates of six dominant tree species: three legumes ( Caesalpinia gaumeri , Lysiloma latisiliquum , Piscidia piscipula ) and three non-legumes ( Bursera simaruba , Gymnopodium floribundum , Neomillspaughia emarginata ) in five successional age categories (8–10, 15–22, 23–30, 65–84, > 85 years-old) and two topographic conditions (flat and sloping sites) in a TDF, and to analyze the association with leaf traits (toughness, N, C and total phenols content) soil properties (bulk density, organic carbon, pH, clay), microenvironmental (litter and soil moisture, leaf area index), and vegetation variables (basal area, aboveground biomass, tree diameter, tree height). Litterbags were placed in 30–400 m 2 circular plots distributed in forests of the Yucatan, Mexico, and collected on six occasions spread over 230 days (540 samples per species). L. latisiliquum and C. gaumeri had the highest decomposition rates (as well as leaf nitrogen concentration and the lowest leaf toughness). Conversely, G. floribundum had the lowest decay rate. Decomposition rate reached high values at intermediate successional ages, suggesting that soil fertility recovers rapidly after disturbance, although only L. latisiliquum showed significant differences among stand age categories. Decomposition rate was consistently higher at flat sites than on slopes but the difference was significant only for L. latisiliquum . The soil, vegetation structure and microenvironmental variables that contributed most to explaining variation in decay rates varied among species. Decomposition tended to increase with soil moisture and clay content, and to decrease with soil organic carbon and pH suggesting susceptibility to climate change and soil erosion, particularly in sloping areas. Our results highlight the importance of analyzing species-specific responses, especially for dominant species, which likely contribute most to leaf litter decomposition, and to consider key ecological factors that influence this key process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.566

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in Forests and Global ChangeSame topicForest ecology and managementFrench-language works237,207