Estimating Indoor Pollutant Loss Using Mass Balances and Unsupervised Clustering to Recognize Decays
Bibliographic record
Abstract
High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Low-cost air quality monitors are increasingly being deployed in various indoor environments. However, data of high temporal resolution from those sensors are often summarized into a single mean value, with information about pollutant dynamics discarded. Further, low-cost sensors often suffer from limitations such as a lack of absolute accuracy and drift over time. There is a growing interest in utilizing data science and machine learning techniques to overcome those limitations and take full advantage of low-cost sensors. In this study, we developed an unsupervised machine learning model for automatically recognizing decay periods from concentration time series data and estimating pollutant loss rates. The model uses k-means and DBSCAN clustering to extract decays and then mass balance equations to estimate loss rates. Applications on data collected from various environments suggest that the CO 2 loss rate was consistently lower than the PM 2.5 loss rate in the same environment, while both varied spatially and temporally. Further, detailed protocols were established to select optimal model hyperparameters and filter out results with high uncertainty. Overall, this model provides a novel solution to monitoring pollutant removal rates with potentially wide applications such as evaluating filtration and ventilation and characterizing indoor emission sources.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".