Simultaneous measurement of nascent transcriptome and translatome using 4-thiouridine metabolic RNA labeling and translating ribosome affinity purification
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Regulation of gene expression in response to various biological processes, including extracellular stimulation and environmental adaptation requires nascent RNA synthesis and translation. Analysis of the coordinated regulation of dynamic RNA synthesis and translation is required to determine functional protein production. However, reliable methods for the simultaneous measurement of nascent RNA synthesis and translation at the gene level are limited. Here, we developed a novel method for the simultaneous assessment of nascent RNA synthesis and translation by combining 4-thiouridine (4sU) metabolic RNA labeling and translating ribosome affinity purification (TRAP) using a monoclonal antibody against evolutionarily conserved ribosomal P-stalk proteins. The P-stalk-mediated TRAP (P-TRAP) technique recovered endogenous translating ribosomes, allowing easy translatome analysis of various eukaryotes. We validated this method in mammalian cells by demonstrating that acute unfolded protein response (UPR) in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) induces dynamic reprogramming of nascent RNA synthesis and translation. Our nascent P-TRAP (nP-TRAP) method may serve as a simple and powerful tool for analyzing the coordinated regulation of transcription and translation of individual genes in various eukaryotes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".