How healthcare professionals transition from being self-employed to being employees: The case of French medical biologists
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The past decades have seen a significant rise in the number of large-scale commercial enterprises entering the healthcare sector, making it difficult for smaller companies and entrepreneurs to remain competitive. This change has meant that an increasing number of healthcare professionals have transitioned from being self-employed entrepreneurs to being company employees. How do healthcare professionals manage this (often reluctant) transition and its resulting tensions? Based on qualitative data (including 40 interviews, 18 h of observation, and 314 archival records) with French medical biologists, we employ the economies of worth framework developed by Boltanski and Thévenot (1991, 2006) to understand the strains healthcare professionals experience related to a coerced change of perspective and how their organization, in turn, uses various strategies to address these tensions. We find that medical biologists experience tensions related to their domestic perspective due to the change of their employment status (from self-employed to company employee) and related to their industrial perspective due to the repositioning of their job (from scientific expert to site manager). To address these concerns, their organization first applied a civic perspective, with mixed results. Searching for a more successful approach, the organization pivoted to a domestic perspective, which was largely counterproductive. Tensions were finally stabilized when the organization developed a structure based on both civic and network principles. Our paper contributes to the literature through demonstrating that tensions need to be resolved at an organizational level first without rushing through a compromise in order to achieve clarification at an individual level.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.013 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".