MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4382364946 · doi:10.4050/f-0079-2023-18086

46 Years of Flight Test - Sikorsky's Development Flight Center

2023· article· en· W4382364946 on OpenAlexaff
Phil Alldridge, Adam Posset, John R. Herter

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAerospace and Aviation Technology
Canadian institutionsLockheed Martin (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAeronauticsFlight testLift (data mining)Test (biology)Center (category theory)EngineeringEnvironmental scienceAerospace engineeringComputer scienceGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sikorsky's Development Flight Center (DFC) began operations in March of 1977, just days before the first flight of the S-76® commercial utility helicopter. Since then, the facility has witnessed a significant number of 'first flights', with development and production programs spanning from small, unmanned, air vehicles (UAV) through to the massive CH-53K heavy lift helicopter, culminating in the recent S-97 RAIDER® and Sikorsky-Boeing SB<1 DEFIANT® programs for the U.S. Army's Future Vertical Lift (FVL) program. This paper will walk the reader through the construction of this unique flight test facility located in the midst of the Florida wetlands, and will highlight some of the major, and often innovative, test programs performed over the last 46 years.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.267
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.189
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAerospace and Aviation TechnologyFrench-language works237,207