MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4382395012 · doi:10.52122/nisantasisbd.1247150

EVALUATION OF THE INCREASE IN PERSONAL CONSUMER LOANS AND CREDIT CARD USAGE AFTER THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC: THE CASE OF TURKEY

2023· article· en· W4382395012 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ayşen Bakkaloğlu

Bibliographic record

VenueNişantaşı üniversitesi sosyal bilimler dergisi/Nişantaşı Üniversitesi sosyal bilimler dergisi · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicCOVID-19 Pandemic Impacts
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)PandemicWorkforceCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)BusinessLoanOrder (exchange)Credit cardAgency (philosophy)FinanceActuarial scienceEconomicsEconomic growthPaymentMedicineGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pandemics on a global scale always bring along important economic crises. The basis of this is the loss of workforce and the adverse effect the supply chain undertakes. Consumer loans and credit cards are the first products that individuals tend to use in order to overcome the difficulties they face while meeting their financial needs, even after the loss of workforce. This study has been carried out to determine the level of tendency of individuals to loan products in the solution of severe financial problems created by the Covid-19 Pandemic. In order to achieve this, the data published by the Banking Regulation and Supervision Agency on a monthly basis, from the first quarter of 2017 until the end of the first quarter of 2022, have been used. At the end of the study, when the data obtained have been evaluated it is seen that there was a great trend towards related credit products from the first days of the Covid-19 Pandemic. It is expected that the data obtained in the study will contribute to the understanding of the importance of the banking system and a better understanding of the economic effects of the pandemic.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.051
Threshold uncertainty score0.101

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.080
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNişantaşı üniversitesi sosyal bilimler dergisi/Nişantaşı Üniversitesi sosyal bilimler dergisiSame topicCOVID-19 Pandemic ImpactsFrench-language works237,207