MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4382395216 · doi:10.18280/ts.400338

Efficient Wavelet Thresholding and Wiener Filtering Association Incorporating a Median Filter Smoother Followed by R-Peaks Recovery for ECG Denoising

2023· article· en· W4382395216 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Abdelkrim Brioua, Redha Benzid, Lamir Saidi

Bibliographic record

VenueTraitement du signal · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicECG Monitoring and Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWiener filterNoise reductionThresholdingFilter (signal processing)WaveletMathematicsArtificial intelligenceHodrick–Prescott filterPattern recognition (psychology)Median filterComputer scienceStatisticsComputer visionEconomicsImage processing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The accurate denoising of acquired electrocardiogram (ECG) signals is a critical preprocessing step in data acquisition for both medical professionals and expert systems to make reliable assessments of cardiac health.In this study, we present an advanced denoising algorithm designed to mitigate the effects of additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN), which is known for its capacity to disrupt the entire frequency band within a signal.Our approach offers a novel integration of wavelet transform and Wiener filtering techniques.The proposed algorithm comprises a single-level discrete wavelet transform (DWT) decomposition followed by hard thresholding of the detail wavelet coefficients and the application of wavelet-domain Wiener filtering to the approximation coefficients.Subsequently, the inverse DWT is employed to generate an initial stage denoised signal.To further improve signal restoration quality, a median filter is utilized.Lastly, to recover Rpeaks affected during the previous stage, each R-peak and its adjacent samples are replaced with those from the denoised signal before median filtering.We compared the performance of our technique with three state-of-the-art methods and found that it is highly competitive with the recently published DWT-SBWT method.Our approach also significantly outperforms both the reference wavelet-thresholding technique and the GS-WT strategy, with gains of more than 1.5 dB in most cases of utilized input SNR levels.These findings demonstrate the efficacy of our proposed algorithm in reducing AWGN interference, enabling more accurate evaluations of human cardiac health.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTraitement du signalSame topicECG Monitoring and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207