MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4382400543 · doi:10.26717/bjstr.2023.48.007624

"Very Accurate Temperature Control of Porcine Bones and Insulating Materials by CO2 Laser: Experimental Data Supported by a Mathematical Model"

2023· article· en· W4382400543 on OpenAlexaff
Luc Lévesque

Bibliographic record

VenueBiomedical Journal of Scientific & Technical Research · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLaser Applications in Dentistry and Medicine
Canadian institutionsRoyal Military College of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAblationSuperheatingLaserBiomedical engineeringLaser ablationMaterials scienceTemperature controlProcess (computing)DentistryComposite materialMechanical engineeringComputer scienceOpticsEngineeringMedicineThermodynamicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Careful temperature control within a few degrees Celsius is very important during therapeutic treatments of soft and hard tissues [1,2]. Accurate control of hard dental tissue surrounding a decayed region under laser ablation [3] within a tooth would also be very useful in order to avoid superheating or moderate heating during a selective process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.097
GPT teacher head0.438
Teacher spread0.340 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiomedical Journal of Scientific & Technical ResearchSame topicLaser Applications in Dentistry and MedicineFrench-language works237,207