A multiplexing activity-based protein profiling platform for dissection of a native bacterial xyloglucan-degrading system
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Bacteria and yeasts grow on biomass polysaccharides by expressing and excreting a complex array of glycoside hydrolase (GH) enzymes. Identification and annotation of such GH pools, which are valuable commodities for sustainable energy and chemistries, by conventional means (genomics, proteomics) is complicated, as primary sequence or secondary structure alignment with known active enzymes is not always predictive for new ones. Here we report a “low-tech”, easy-to-use and sensitive, multiplexing activity-based protein profiling platform to characterize the xyloglucan-degrading GH system excreted by the soil saprophyte, Cellvibrio japonicus when grown on xyloglucan. A suite of activity-based probes bearing orthogonal fluorophores allows for the visualization of accessory exo-acting glycosidases, which are then identified using biotin-bearing probes. Substrate specificity of xyloglucanases is directly revealed by imbuing xyloglucan structural elements into bespoke activity-based probes. Our ABPP platform provides a highly useful tool to dissect xyloglucan-degrading systems from various sources and to rapidly select potentially useful ones. The observed specificity of the probes moreover bodes well for the study of other biomass polysaccharide degrading systems, by modelling probe structures to those of desired substrates.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".