MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4382406596 · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-31299-1_14

Collective Writing: The Continuous Struggle for Meaning-Making

2023· book-chapter· en· W4382406596 on OpenAlexaff
Petar Jandrić, Timothy W. Luke, Sean Sturm, Peter McLaren, Liz Jackson, Alison MacKenzie, Marek Tesař, Georgina Stewart, Peter Roberts, Sandra Abegglen, Tom Burns, Sandra Sinfield, Sarah Hayes, Jimmy Jaldemark, Michael A. Peters, Christine Sinclair, Andrew Gibbons

Bibliographic record

VenuePostdigital science and education · 2023
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDigital Education and Society
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMeaning (existential)Reading (process)MilestoneEpistemologySociologyLinguisticsHistoryPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.016
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.038

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0080.042
Scholarly communication0.0200.017
Open science0.0020.008
Research integrity0.0040.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venuePostdigital science and educationSame topicDigital Education and SocietyFrench-language works237,207