MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Irrigation as a Cushion for the Effects of Global Warming and Its Soil Salinity Implication on Crop Growth in Nigeria

2022· article· en· W4382407738 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Bello Yusuph Adebayo

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSoil and Land Suitability Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIrrigationSalinityEnvironmental scienceCropSoil salinityGlobal warmingCushionAgronomyAgricultural engineeringAgroforestrySoil waterClimate changeSoil scienceGeologyGeographyEngineeringOceanographyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Global warming is the general rise in global temperature caused by higher-than-normal amounts of greenhouse gases, which traps heat approaching the globe and allows heat waves to continue accessing the atmosphere and being unable to escape over time.Following worldwide attempts to phase out chlorinated fluids in order to preserve the ozone layer as a result of the Montreal Protocol, this study employed low-GWP alternative refrigerants to minimize greenhouse gas emissions.The Cycle-D-Hx software, which is a thermodynamic model of the refrigeration system with a graphical user interface, was used to assess the performance of household refrigerators using various types of refrigerants.Data from an R134A-charged household refrigerator was used to verify the model.The model was then used to evaluate the performance of a number of low-GWP alternative refrigerants, such as R404A, R449A, R513A, and R452A.The R452A was shown to have a high COP, a low potential for global warming, a low temperature glide, and a low potential for ozone depletion.In addition to these thermodynamic and environmental features, R452A blend is non-flammable, non-corrosive, and will not cause degradation of the metal parts of the refrigerating system's evaporator and compressor.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.033
Threshold uncertainty score0.258

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSoil and Land Suitability AnalysisFrench-language works237,207