Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the twenty-first century, attention to the constitutional monarchy in Canada has increased markedly among academics and those involved in public policy, government, and the law.Given its mandate to study the dynamics of the Canadian federation, the Institute of Intergovernmental Relations at Queen's University was pleased to be the organizing partner of a conference, "The Crown in Canada: Present Realities and Future Options," held in Ottawa in 2010.We were also pleased to publish through McGill-Queen's University Press the resulting book, The Evolving Canadian Crown, edited by Jennifer Smith and D. Michael Jackson, which appeared early in 2012, the year of the Diamond Jubilee of Queen Elizabeth II.The institution of the Crown understandably took on an even higher profile among the Canadian public in Diamond Jubilee Year.It was therefore timely indeed that a second conference on the Crown took place in October 2012, this time at Government House in Regina.Called "The Crown in Canada: A Diamond Jubilee Assessment," the conference was co-sponsored by the Government of Saskatchewan and the Johnson-Shoyama Graduate School of Public Policy at the Universities of Regina and Saskatchewan, with generous support from The Mosaic Company and the Whitecap Dakota First Nation.The Institute of Intergovernmental Relations was glad to be involved in this conference, which brought together leading academics and practitioners
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.353 | 0.174 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".