L’avenir dans la généricité du « récit d’anticipation »
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’apparition et le développement de l’appellation générique « récit d’anticipation », au début du xxe siècle, semblent constituer un genre autour de l’idée de l’avenir. Comment celle-ci s’inscrit-elle dans les textes de fiction ? Dans quelle mesure constitue-t-elle un critère définitoire du genre, tel qu’il est perçu par ceux qui l’écrivent et le lisent ? En combinant analyse poétique des œuvres et examen des discours auctoriaux et critiques, cet article distingue deux modalités d’anticipation – diégétique et discursive –, selon que l’avenir constitue le cadre temporel de l’intrigue ou qu’il est l’objet du discours sur le monde réel mené via la fiction, et il étudie leur articulation dans la définition d’un genre.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it