MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4382501469 · doi:10.1097/pec.0000000000002983

Development of a Model to Identify Febrile Children at Low Risk for Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome

2023· article· en· W4382501469 on OpenAlexaff
Tamar R. Lubell, Mark Gorelik, Dori Abel, Avital Fischer, Gabriel Apfel, Katherine A. Ryan, Tian Wang, Brett R. Anderson, Kanwal M. Farooqi, Peter S. Dayan

Bibliographic record

VenuePediatric Emergency Care · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicKawasaki Disease and Coronary Complications
Canadian institutionsColumbia College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineOdds ratioEmergency departmentConfidence intervalPediatricsKawasaki diseaseRashRetrospective cohort studyLogistic regressionDiseaseAbdominal painVital signsInternal medicineSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVES: The case definition for multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) is broad and encompasses symptoms and signs commonly seen in children with fever. Our aim was to identify clinical predictors that, independently or in combination, identify febrile children presenting to the emergency department (ED) as low risk for MIS-C. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective single-center study of otherwise healthy children 2 months to 20 years of age presenting to the ED with fever and who had a laboratory evaluation for MIS-C between April 15, 2020, and October 31, 2020. We excluded children with a diagnosis of Kawasaki disease. Our outcome was an MIS-C diagnosis defined by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention criteria. We conducted multivariable logistic regression analyses to identify variables independently associated with MIS-C. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients with and 128 patients without MIS-C were analyzed. Of those with MIS-C, 16 of 33 (48.5%) had hypotension for age, signs of hypoperfusion, or required ionotropic support. Four variables were independently associated with the presence of MIS-C; known or suspected SARS CoV-2 exposure (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 4.0; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.4-11.9) and the following 3 symptoms and signs: abdominal pain on history (aOR, 4.8; 95% CI, 1.7-15.0), conjunctival injection (aOR, 15.2; 95% CI, 5.4-48.1), and rash involving the palms or soles (aOR, 12.2; 95% CI, 2.4-69.4). Children were at low risk of MIS-C if none of the 3 symptoms or signs were present (sensitivity 87.9% [95% CI, 71.8-96.6]; specificity 62.5% [53.5-70.9], negative predictive value 95.2% [88.3-98.7]). Of the 4 MIS-C patients without any of these 3 factors, 2 were ill-appearing in the ED and the other 2 had no cardiovascular involvement during their clinical course. CONCLUSIONS: A combination of 3 clinical symptoms and signs had moderate to high sensitivity and high negative predictive value for identifying febrile children at low risk of MIS-C. If validated, these factors could aid clinicians in determining the need to obtain or forego an MIS-C laboratory evaluation during SARS-CoV-2 prevalent periods in febrile children.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.679

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePediatric Emergency CareSame topicKawasaki Disease and Coronary ComplicationsFrench-language works237,207