MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4382502221 · doi:10.1021/acs.jmedchem.3c00664

Alicyclic Ring Size Variation of 4-Phenyl-2-naphthoic Acid Derivatives as P2Y <sub>14</sub> Receptor Antagonists

2023· article· en· W4382502221 on OpenAlexaff
Zhiwei Wen, Asmita Pramanik, Sarah A. Lewicki, Kwan‐Young Jung, Zhan‐Guo Gao, John C.R. Randle, Chunxia Cronin, Zhoumou Chen, Luigino Antonio Giancotti, Gregory S. Whitehead, Bruce T. Liang, Sylvie Breton, Daniela Salvemini, Donald N. Cook, Kenneth A. Jacobson

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Medicinal Chemistry · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAdenosine and Purinergic Signaling
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
FundersNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney DiseasesNational Institute of Mental HealthNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsChemistryStereochemistryAlicyclic compoundProdrugSteric effectsAntagonistRing sizePiperidineIsostereBicyclic moleculeReceptorRing (chemistry)BiochemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

P2Y 14 receptor (P2Y 14 R) is activated by extracellular UDP-glucose, a damage-associated molecular pattern that promotes inflammation in the kidney, lung, fat tissue, and elsewhere. Thus, selective P2Y 14 R antagonists are potentially useful for inflammatory and metabolic diseases. The piperidine ring size of potent, competitive P2Y 14 R antagonist (4-phenyl-2-naphthoic acid derivative) PPTN 1 was varied from 4- to 8-membered rings, with bridging/functional substitution. Conformationally and sterically modified isosteres included N -containing spirocyclic ( 6 – 9 ), fused ( 11 – 13 ), and bridged ( 14, 15 ) or large ( 16 – 20 ) ring systems, either saturated or containing alkene or hydroxy/methoxy groups. The alicyclic amines displayed structural preference. An α-hydroxyl group increased the affinity of 4-(4-((1 R,5 S,6 r )-6-hydroxy-3-azabicyclo[3.1.1]heptan-6-yl)phenyl)-7-(4-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)-2-naphthoic acid 15 (MRS4833) compared to 14 by 89-fold. 15 but not its double prodrug 50 reduced airway eosinophilia in a protease-mediated asthma model, and orally administered 15 and prodrugs reversed chronic neuropathic pain (mouse CCI model). Thus, we identified novel drug leads having in vivo efficacy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Medicinal ChemistrySame topicAdenosine and Purinergic SignalingFrench-language works237,207