MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4382516552 · doi:10.1101/2023.06.23.23291813

Air pollution, lung function and mortality: survival and mediation analyses in UK Biobank

2023· preprint· en· W4382516552 on OpenAlexaff
Anna L. Guyatt, Yutong Cai, Dany Doiron, Martin D. Tobin, Anna Hansell

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2023
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAir Quality and Health Impacts
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityMcGill University Health Centre
FundersHealth and Safety ExecutiveUniversity of LeicesterNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchNational Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research UnitDepartment of Health and Social CareBritish Heart FoundationWellcome Trust
KeywordsMedicineHazard ratioVital capacityProportional hazards modelSpirometryBiobankCohortDemographyCohort studyInternal medicineConfidence intervalEnvironmental healthLung functionLungDiffusing capacity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Air pollution is associated with lower lung function, and both are associated with premature mortality and cardiovascular disease (CVD). Evidence remains scarce on the potential mediating effect of impaired lung function on the association between air pollution and mortality or CVD. Methods We used data from the UK Biobank cohort (∼200,000 individuals) with 8-year follow-up to mortality and incident CVD. Exposures to PM 10 , PM 2.5 , and NO 2 at baseline were assessed by land-use regression modelling. Lung function [forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV 1 ), Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)] was measured by spirometry and transformed to Global Lung Function Initiative z-scores. Adjusted Cox proportional hazards and causal proportional hazards mediation analysis models were fitted, stratified by smoking status. Results Lower FEV 1 and FVC were associated with all-cause and CVD mortality, and incident CVD. Point estimates for the mortality outcomes were larger in ever-smokers than never-smokers (all-cause mortality Hazard Ratio (HR) per decrease FEV 1 GLI z-score, ever smokers: 1.29 [95%CI:1.24-1.34], versus never-smokers: HR 1.16 [95%CI:1.12-1.21]). Long-term exposure to PM 2.5 or NO 2 was associated with incident CVD, with similar effect sizes for ever and never smokers. Mediated proportions of the air pollution—all-cause mortality estimates driven by FEV 1 were 18% [95%CI: 2%-33%] for PM 2.5 , and 27% [95%CI: 3%-51%] for NO 2 . The estimated mediated proportions for air pollution—incident CVD were 9% [95%CI: 4%-13%] for PM 2.5 and 16% [95%CI: 6%-25%] for NO 2 . Conclusions Lower FEV 1 may mediate some associations between air pollution on mortality and CVD outcomes, with more pronounced effect sizes for NO 2 than for PM 2.5 . Take-home message Adverse effects of air pollution on lower lung function (FEV 1 ) potentially mediate 10-30% of the effects of PM 2.5 or NO 2 on mortality and incident cardiovascular disease.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.017
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.050
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.077
Threshold uncertainty score0.152

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0170.050
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.123
GPT teacher head0.377
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemedRxiv→Same topicAir Quality and Health Impacts→French-language works237,207→