Parametric Analysis of the Static Behavior of Long Cylindrical Concrete Thin Shells under Self-Weight Loading
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this study, a comprehensive parametric investigation of the static behavior of long cylindrical concrete thin shells subjected to self-weight loading is presented.The analysis was conducted using the ANSYS software, and the effects of three factors, namely span, central angle, and thickness, were systematically examined.It was observed that the central angle, thickness, and span significantly influenced the shells' performance.Specifically, larger central angles led to increased deflection under loading, and thicker shells demonstrated enhanced resistance to buckling.Furthermore, the shell's span was found to have a notable impact on its overall behavior, with longer shells exhibiting greater deflection compared to shorter ones.The obtained results were compared with a numerical model from previous research, showing a difference of less than 5%.This close agreement lends credence to the study's conclusions and interpretations.The findings of this investigation contribute valuable insights to the field of cylindrical concrete thin shells, providing a solid foundation for future research and practical applications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it