The Life and Inheritance of the Notable of Edirne Dagdevirenzade Mehmed Aga
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dagdevirenzade Mehmed Aga, the notable of Edirne, was a political figure who played an important role in the political developments of the empire in general and the Balkans in particular in the first quarter of the 19th century. He served in significant positions for the Ottoman Empire, such as Nüzül Eminliği, âyanlık and bostancıbaşı. Mehmed Aga, who started to gain influence in the region at the beginning of the XIXth century, was one of the important actors in the Edirne Incident against the Nizam-ı Cedid. After this incident, he was appointed as Bostancıbaşı and served until his death. During the Ottoman-Russian War of 1806-1812, in addition to taking care of the security in Rumelia, he was also assigned for the shipment of provisions and soldiers for the Army. The period of Selim III, during which Mehmed Aga made a name for himself, was a time when the Ottoman central authority was weakening in the Balkans. The economic problems of the Ottoman Empire in this period led to the development of the malikâne system. The malikâne system, in turn, resulted in the formation of a local ruling class called the âyan and its rise to power. This situation continued until the first years of Mahmud II's sultanate. After 1813, Mahmud II pursued strategies to strengthen central authority in the Balkans. In this respect, Dagdevirenzade Mehmed Aga was also a target of Mahmud II's policies and was eliminated. In this study, the political, military, and economic activities of the Edirne ayan Dagdevirenzade Mehmed Aga will be analyzed by taking into account the political conjuncture of the period.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".