MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4382540617 · doi:10.1103/physrevb.107.235153

Complex fixed points of the non-Hermitian Kondo model in a Luttinger liquid

2023· article· en· W4382540617 on OpenAlexafffund
SangEun Han, Daniel J. Schultz, Yong Baek Kim

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. B./Physical review. B · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicQuantum Mechanics and Non-Hermitian Physics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaJohn Simon Guggenheim Memorial FoundationSimons Foundation
KeywordsHermitian matrixFixed pointPhysicsKondo modelLuttinger liquidRenormalization groupQuantumQuantum mechanicsKondo effectQuantum phase transitionRenormalizationElectronTheoretical physicsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Non-Hermitian physics in open quantum many-body systems provides novel opportunities for the discovery of exotic quantum phenomena unexpected in Hermitian systems. A previous study of the non-Hermitian Kondo problem in ultracold atoms reports reversion of renormalization group flows which violates the $g$ theorem and produces an unusual quantum phase transition. In this work, we study the effect of electron-electron interactions by considering the non-Hermitian Kondo problem in a Luttinger liquid. By performing a perturbative renormalization group analysis to two-loop order, we find that the interplay between non-Hermitian Kondo couplings and electron-electron interactions can produce a pair of complex fixed points. Complex fixed points have often been discussed in an attempt to understand the extremely long correlation length of Hermitian systems with weakly first-order transitions. Here, we show that complex fixed points arise naturally and can be physically realized in open quantum systems. We discuss consequences of the complex fixed points and future directions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.431
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.358
Teacher spread0.327 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. B./Physical review. BSame topicQuantum Mechanics and Non-Hermitian PhysicsFrench-language works237,207