MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4382542928 · doi:10.18280/mmep.100315

Nanomaterials and Phase-Changing Materials in a U Vacuum Tube Solar Collector

2023· article· en· W4382542928 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ali Najim Abdullah Saieed, Muna Hameed Alturaihi, Lina Jassim, Hasan Sh. Majdi

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematical Modelling and Engineering Problems · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRadiative Heat Transfer Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTube (container)NanomaterialsMaterials scienceVacuum tubeNanotechnologyEngineering physicsComposite materialEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Solar Water Heating (SWH) systems provide an environmentally friendly means of generating hot water for domestic or commercial applications by harnessing solar radiation throughout the year.Despite their benefits, SWH systems can be limited by inconsistent solar energy density, often necessitating the use of auxiliary booster units.Recent research has demonstrated that incorporating phase change materials (PCMs) as energy storage media in SWH systems can mitigate the need for booster units.In this study, a novel SWH system was designed with a PCM-based storage unit integrated into a U-shaped vacuum tube solar collector, incorporating Al2O3 nanoparticles to enhance thermal performance.Mathematical simulations were conducted to analyze the melting and solidification processes of the PCM over 3600 s daytime and nighttime intervals.Results indicated that the addition of nanoparticles led to a significant improvement in daily thermal efficiency, despite minor variations in outlet temperature.It was observed that the heat transfer mechanism was accelerated in the morning due to solar energy, with optimal fluid solidification achieved at 0.5 wt percent nanoparticle concentration.In the absence of sunlight, the thermal discharge process commenced, transferring heat from the PCM to the evacuated tube and gradually solidifying the material.This study highlights the potential of nanomaterial-enhanced PCM integration for optimizing SWH system performance and reducing the reliance on auxiliary booster units.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMathematical Modelling and Engineering ProblemsSame topicRadiative Heat Transfer StudiesFrench-language works237,207