A coherent composite approach for the continuous circular hydraulic jump and vortex structure
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We examine the structure of the continuous circular hydraulic jump and recirculation for a jet impinging on a disk. We use a composite mean-field thin-film approach consisting of subdividing the flow domain into three regions of increasing gravity strength: a developing boundary layer near impact, an intermediate supercritical viscous layer and a region comprising the jump and subcritical flow. Unlike existing models, the approach does not require any empirically or numerically adjusted boundary conditions. We demonstrate that the stress or corner singularity for a film draining at the edge is equivalent to an infinite slope of the film surface, which we impose as the downstream boundary condition. The model is validated against existing experiment and numerical simulation of the boundary-layer and Navier–Stokes equations. We find that the flow in the supercritical region remains insensitive to the change in gravity level but is greatly affected by viscosity. The existence of the jump is not necessarily commensurate with the presence of recirculation, which is strongly dependent on the upstream curvature and steepness of the jump.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".