Numerical Simulation of Heat Transfer and Flow Enhancement Through Multi-Row Film Holes for Gas Turbine Blade Cooling
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To increase gas turbine power output and thermal efficiency, turbine inlet temperatures can exceed the melting point of component materials.Blade cooling techniques are thus required.This study reviews external cooling methods for gas turbine blade tips.Recent publications on cooling technology improvements were analyzed to enhance turbine blade cooling.The operating conditions and cooling requirements of turbine blades were examined.Air was blown through a duct in the turbine blade at lower temperatures to cool the blade by adjusting the air pressure to match internal pressures.The inlet air pressure was 24,000 Pa.Experiments were conducted by varying the air pressure.At 25,000 Pa, the air flow improved.Increasing the pressure to 30,000, 35,000, and 40,000 Pa resulted in the cooled air flowing away from the blade, causing blockage and reduced inlet air pressure.Reducing the pressure to 24,000 Pa caused the air to be retained, preventing its exit through the holes and increasing blade temperature.The optimal cooling was achieved at 25,000 Pa.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".