Förster Resonance Energy Transfer Sensitized Singlet Fission in BODIPY‐Pentacene Dimer Conjugates
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract In the present work, the energy donor 4,4‐difluoro‐4‐bora‐3a,4a‐diaza‐s‐indacene (BODIPY) is used for the first time in combination with a pentacene dimer (Pnc2) to provide the conjugate BODIPYPnc2 that features absorption throughout a large part of the solar spectrum. Upon photoexcitation, the singlet excited state energy of BODIPY is transferred to the pentacene dimer via intramolecular Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET). Subsequently, the pentacene dimer undergoes intramolecular singlet fission. In this process, a singlet correlated triplet pair is generated from the first singlet excited state via coupling to an intermediate state. The results show that solvent polarity has an influence on the system, with the largest FRET rate (i.e., 7.46 × 1011 s−1) being obtained in the most polar solvent (namely, benzonitrile) along with the largest triplet quantum yield (i.e., 207 ± 20%).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".